Consistent deformations of dual formulations of linearized gravity: A no-go result

[en] The consistent, local, smooth deformations of the dual formulation of linearized gravity involving a tensor field in the exotic representation of the Lorentz group with Young symmetry type (D-3,1) (one column of length D-3 and one column of length 1) are systematically investigated. The rigidity of the Abelian gauge algebra is first established. We next prove a no-go theorem for interactions involving at most two derivatives of the fields.

Research center :

AGIF - Algèbre, Géométrie et Interactions fondamentales

Disciplines :

Physics

Author, co-author :

Bekaert, Xavier

Boulanger, Nicolas

Henneaux, M.

Language :

English

Title :

Consistent deformations of dual formulations of linearized gravity: A no-go result

Publication date :

26 February 2003

Journal title :

Physical Review. D, Particles and Fields

ISSN :

0556-2821

Publisher :

American Physical Society, Lancaster, Panama

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Available on ORBi UMONS :

since 18 December 2012

Statistics

Number of views

1 (0 by UMONS)

Number of downloads

0 (0 by UMONS)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

107

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

Bibliography

C.M. Hull, J. High Energy Phys. 09, 027 (2001).
T. Curtright, Phys. Lett. 165B, 304 (1985).
C.M. Hull, Nucl. Phys. B583, 237 (2000).
C.M. Hull, J. High Energy Phys. 12, 007 (2000).
H. Casini, R. Montemayor, and L.F. Urrutia, Phys. Lett. B 507, 336 (2001).
R.P. Feynman, F.B. Morinigo, W.G. Wagner, and B. Hatfield, Feynman Lectures on Gravitation (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1995), p. 232 (the advanced book program);
S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 138, B988 (1965);
V.I. Ogievetski and I.V. Polubarinov, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 35, 167 (1965);
S. Deser, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 1, 9 (1970);
F.A. Berends, G.J. Burgers, and H. Van Dam, Z. Phys. C 24, 247 (1984).
R.M. Wald, Phys. Rev. D 33, 3613 (1986).
N. Boulanger, T. Damour, L. Gualtieri, and M. Henneaux, Nucl. Phys. B597, 127 (2001).
C.S. Aulakh, I.G. Koh, and S. Ouvry, Phys. Lett. B 173, 284 (1986).
J.M. Labastida and T.R. Morris, Phys. Lett. B 180, 101 (1986).
J.M. Labastida, Nucl. Phys. B322, 185 (1989).
C.M. Hull (private communication).
A.K. Bengtsson, I. Bengtsson, and L. Brink, Nucl. Phys. B227, 31 (1983).
M.A. Vasiliev, hep-th/9910096;
M.A. Vasilievhep-th/0104246;
M.A. VasilievNucl. Phys. B616, 106 (2001), and references therein.
E. Sezgin and P. Sundell, Nucl. Phys. B634, 120 (2002);
Nucl. Phys.E. SezginP. SundellB644, 303 (2002), and references therein.
A.Y. Segal, hep-th/0207212.
D. Francia and A. Sagnotti, Phys. Lett. B 543, 303 (2002).
E. Cremmer, B. Julia, and J. Scherk, Phys. Lett. 76B, 409 (1978).
T. Damour, M. Henneaux, and H. Nicolai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 221601 (2002).
B. Julia, in Lectures in Applied Mathematics Vol. 21 (AMS-SIAM, Providence, 1985), p. 335;report LPTENS 80/16.
D.J. Gross, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1229 (1988).
P.C. West, Class. Quantum Grav. 18, 4443 (2001).
N.A. Obers, B. Pioline, and E. Rabinovici, Nucl. Phys. B525, 163 (1998).
M. Banados, R. Troncoso, and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. D 54, 2605 (1996).
C. Burdik, A. Pashnev, and M. Tsulaia, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 16, 731 (2001).
G. Barnich and M. Henneaux, Phys. Lett. B 311, 123 (1993);
M. Henneaux, Contemp. Math. 219, 93 (1998).
I.A. Batalin and G.A. Vilkovisky, Phys. Lett. 102B, 27 (1981);
I.A. BatalinG.A. VilkoviskyPhys. Rev. D 28, 2567 (1983);
Phys. Rev. DI.A. BatalinG.A. Vilkovisky30, 508(E) (1984).
J.M. Fisch and M. Henneaux, Commun. Math. Phys. 128, 627 (1990);
M. Henneaux, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Suppl.) 18A, 47 (1990);M. Henneaux and C. Teitelboim, Quantization of Gauge Systems (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1992).
J. Gomis, J. Paris, and S. Samuel, Phys. Rep. 259, 1 (1995).
C. Bizdadea, M.T. Miauta, and S.O. Saliu, Eur. Phys. J. C 21, 577 (2001);
C. Bizdadea, E.M. Cioroianu, and S.O. Saliu, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 17, 2191 (2002);
C. BizdadeaE.M. CioroianuS.O. Saliuhep-th/0209109.
J.A. Garcia and B. Knaepen, Phys. Lett. B 441, 198 (1998).
G. Barnich, F. Brandt, and M. Henneaux, Commun. Math. Phys. 174, 57 (1995).
G. Barnich, F. Brandt, and M. Henneaux, Commun. Math. Phys. 174, 93 (1995);
for a review, see G. Barnich, F. Brandt, and M. Henneaux, Phys. Rep. 338, 439 (2000).
M. Henneaux, B. Knaepen, and C. Schomblond, Commun. Math. Phys. 186, 137 (1997);
M. Henneaux and B. Knaepen, Phys. Rev. D 56, 6076 (1997).
X. Bekaert, B. Knaepen, and C. Schomblond, Phys. Lett. B 481, 89 (2000).
F. Brandt and U. Theis, Nucl. Phys. B550, 495 (1999);
F. BrandtU. TheisFortschr. Phys. 48, 41 (2000);
F. Brandt, J. Simon, and U. Theis, Class. Quantum Grav. 17, 1627 (2000).
S.C. Anco, math-ph/0209051;
S.C. Ancomath-ph/0209052.
X. Bekaert and N. Boulanger, hep-th/0208058.
P. de Medeiros and C. Hull, hep-th/0208155.
M. Dubois-Violette and M. Henneaux, Commun. Math. Phys. 226, 393 (2002).
P. Olver, “Differential hyperforms I,” University of Minnesota report 82-101.
M. Henneaux, Commun. Math. Phys. 140, 1 (1991).
Hyperforms are in irreps of the general linear group, while multiforms sit in reducible ones.