Environmental impacts of the production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide

[en] Life cycle assessment; [en] Techno-economic investigation; [en] CO2 capture and utilization; [en] Power-to-gas technology; [en] Uncertainty analysis; Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering; Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment; Environmental Chemistry; Environmental Engineering

Abstract :

[en] Power-to-Gas technologies (PtG) are regarded as promising options to defossilize the energy system, by converting and storing renewable electricity to gases, and to mitigate CO2 emissions, when combined with carbon capture and utilization from large point sources, such as energy intensive and hard-to-abate sectors, where a major part of CO2 emissions cannot be avoided. However, these technologies have several environmental impacts throughout their lifetimes that must be assessed, due to the use of resources, materials, and energy, as well as the formation of chemical by-products. Using a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology, this paper aims to assess the most significant environmental impacts of an integrated PtG system including the conversion of renewable energy to hydrogen through water wind-based electrolysis, that is further converted to synthetic natural gas (SNG) by reacting with captured CO2 from a cement plant flue gas. More precisely, the present work innovates on both the technical (an advanced CO2 capture process considered, using mixed amines solvent and innovative configuration to reduce the energy consumption to 2.3 GJ per tCO2, and including an optimized heat integration with the CO2 conversion step) and methodological (hybrid approach combining physical and economic input data for the life cycle inventory) perspectives. Additionally, both subdivision and system expansion via substitution approaches are applied to consider the multi-functionality of the systems. Additionally, both subdivision and system expansion via substitution approaches are applied to consider the multi-functionality of the systems. Simulation results show that the PtG process with CO2 captured from cement plants flue gas reduces the overall GHG emissions by 76%. Similarly, the fossil resource scarcity is drastically reduced by over 80% thanks to the heat integration between the CO2 capture and the CO2 conversion processes, but also thanks to the substitution of natural gas by the CO2-based SNG. Nevertheless, environmental impacts of PtG are higher than conventional natural gas production for other impact categories, including freshwater eutrophication, terrestrial acidification, and mineral resource scarcity. Both data uncertainties, assessing the knowledge base underlying the input data parameters, and sensitivity analysis, assessing the value range of the parameters respectively to the environmental indicators, are conducted to test the results and highlight the uncertainty hotspots.

Disciplines :

Chemical engineering
Environmental sciences & ecology
Chemistry

Author, co-author :

Chauvy, Remi

Dubois, Lionel ; Université de Mons > Faculté Polytechnique > Service de Génie des Procédés chimiques et biochimiques

Thomas, Diane ; Université de Mons > Faculté Polytechnique > Service de Génie des Procédés chimiques et biochimiques

De Weireld, Guy ; Université de Mons > Faculté Polytechnique > Service de Thermodynamique, Physique mathématiques

Language :

English

Title :

Environmental impacts of the production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide

Publication date :

07 December 2021

Journal title :

Sustainable Production and Consumption

Publisher :

Elsevier, Netherlands

Volume :

Pages :

301-315

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Additional URL :

https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S2352550921003511?httpAccept=text/xml

Research unit :

F505 - Génie des Procédés chimiques et biochimiques
F506 - Thermodynamique, Physique mathématiques

Research institute :

R200 - Institut de Recherche en Energie

Available on ORBi UMONS :

since 28 December 2021

Statistics

Number of views

48 (8 by UMONS)

Number of downloads

1 (1 by UMONS)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Abdon, A., Zhang, X., Parra, D., Patel, M.K., Bauer, C., Worlitschek, J., Techno-economic and environmental assessment of stationary electricity storage technologies for different time scales. Energy 139 (2017), 1173–1187, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.097.
Althaus, H.J., Hischier, R., Osses, M., Primas, A., Hellweg, S., Jungbluth, N., Chudacoff, M., Ecoinvent Report No. 8, v2.0., 2007, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories. EMPA Dübendorf.
Anwar, M.N., Fayyaz, A., Sohail, N.F., Khokhar, M.F., Baqar, M., Yasar, A., Rasool, K., Nazir, A., Raja, M.U.F., Rehan, M., Aghbashlo, M., Tabatabaei, M., Nizami, A.S., CO2 utilization: turning greenhouse gas into fuels and valuable products. J. Environ. Manage., 260, 2020, 110059, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110059.
Artz, J., Müller, T.E., Thenert, K., Kleinekorte, J., Meys, R., Sternberg, A., Bardow, A., Leitner, W., Sustainable conversion of carbon dioxide: an integrated review of catalysis and life cycle assessment. Chem. Rev. 118:2 (2018), 434–504, 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00435.
Azari, R., Life cycle energy consumption of buildings; embodied + operational. Sustainable Construction Technologies, 2019, Elsevier, 10.1016/B978-0-12-811749-1.00004-3.
Bareiß, K., de la Rua, C., Möckl, M., Hamacher, T., Life cycle assessment of hydrogen from proton exchange membrane water electrolysis in future energy systems. Appl. Energy, 2019, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.001.
Becker, W.L., Penev, M., Braun, R.J., Production of synthetic natural gas from carbon dioxide and renewably generated hydrogen: a techno-economic analysis of a power-to-gas strategy. J. Energy Resour. Technol., 141, 2018, 021901, 10.1115/1.4041381.
Breeze, P., Power System Energy Storage Technologies. 2018, Elsevier, 10.1016/C2016-0-03680-X.
Cetinkaya, E., Dincer, I., Naterer, G.F., Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37 (2012), 2071–2080, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.10.064.
Chauvy, R., Dubois, L., Lybaert, P., Thomas, D., De Weireld, G., Production of synthetic natural gas from industrial carbon dioxide. Appl. Energy, 260, 2020, 114249, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114249.
Chauvy, R., Verdonck, D., Dubois, L., Thomas, D., De Weireld, G., Techno-economic feasibility and sustainability of an integrated carbon capture and conversion process to synthetic natural gas. J. CO2 Util., 47, 2021, 101488, 10.1016/j.jcou.2021.101488.
Christensen, P., Dysert, L.R., AACE International Recommended Practice 18R–97 - Cost Estimate Classification System – As Applied in Engineering, Procurement, and Construction for the Process Industries. 2005, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Crawford, R.H., Bontinck, P.A., Stephan, A., Wiedmann, T., Yu, M., Hybrid life cycle inventory methods – a review. J. Clean. Prod. 172 (2018), 1273–1288, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.176.
Jenkins S., Chemical Engeneering Plant Cost Index: 2018 Annual Value. Available at: www.chemengonline.com, 2019 (accessed 17/11/2021).
Dubois, L., Thomas, D., Comparison of various configurations of the absorption-regeneration process using different solvents for the post-combustion CO2 capture applied to cement plant flue gases. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 69 (2018), 20–35, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.12.004.
Dubois, L., Thomas, D., Optimization of the post-combustion CO2 capture process applied to cement plant flue gases: parametric study with different solvents and configurations combined with intercooling. International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, Melbourne, 2018.
ECRA, C.S.I. Development of state of the art-techniques in cement manufacturing: trying to look ahead. CSI/ECRATechnology Papers 2017, 2017, European Cement Research Academy; Cement Sustainability Initiative, Duesseldorf, Geneva, 2017 Available at http://www.wbcsdcement.org/technology.
Edelen, A., Ingwersen, W.W., The creation, management, and use of data quality information for life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 23:4 (2018), 759–772, 10.1007/s11367-017-1348-1.
Eurostat. RAMON - Reference And Management Of Nomenclatures - METADATA Statistical Classification of Economic Activities in the European Community. Review, 2, 2008 URL https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/ramon/nomenclatures (accessed 11.11.20).
Eveloy, V., Gebreegziabher, T., A review of projected power-to-gas deployment scenarios. Energies, 11, 2018, 10.3390/en11071824.
Fendt, S., Buttler, A., Gaderer, M., Spliethoff, H., Comparison of synthetic natural gas production pathways for the storage of renewable energy. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Energy Environ. 5 (2016), 327–350, 10.1002/wene.189.
Fernández-Dacosta, C., Stojcheva, V., Ramirez, A., Closing carbon cycles: evaluating the performance of multi-product CO2 utilisation and storage configurations in a refinery. J. CO2 Util. 23 (2018), 128–142, 10.1016/j.jcou.2017.11.008.
Fernández-Dacosta, C., Van Der Spek, M., Hung, C.R., Oregionni, G.D., Skagestad, R., Parihar, P., Gokak, D.T., Strømman, A.H., Ramirez, A., Prospective techno-economic and environmental assessment of carbon capture at a refinery and CO2 utilisation in polyol synthesis. J. CO2 Util. 21 (2017), 405–422, 10.1016/j.jcou.2017.08.005.
Gardarsdottir, S.O., De Lena, E., Romano, M., Roussanaly, S., Voldsund, M., Pérez-Calvo, J.-.F., Berstad, D., Fu, C., Anantharaman, R., Sutter, D., Gazzani, M., Mazzotti, M., Cinti, G., Comparison of technologies for CO2 capture from cement production—part 2: cost analysis. Energies, 12, 2019, 542, 10.3390/en12030542.
Ghandehariun, S., Kumar, A., Life cycle assessment of wind-based hydrogen production in Western Canada. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 41 (2016), 1–9, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.077.
Gielen, D., Boshell, F., Saygin, D., Bazilian, M.D., Wagner, N., Gorini, R., The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strateg. Rev. 24 (2019), 38–50, 10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006.
Giordano, L., Roizard, D., Favre, E., Life cycle assessment of post-combustion CO2 capture: a comparison between membrane separation and chemical absorption processes. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 68 (2018), 146–163, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2017.11.008.
Guandalini, G., Campanari, S., Romano, M.C., Power-to-gas plants and gas turbines for improved wind energy dispatchability: energy and economic assessment. Appl. Energy 147 (2015), 117–130, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.055.
He, Z., Wang, S., Mahoutian, M., Shao, Y., Flue gas carbonation of cement-based building products. J. CO2 Util. 37 (2020), 309–319, 10.1016/j.jcou.2020.01.001.
Hendrickson, C., Horvath, A., Joshi, S., Lave, L., Peer reviewed: economic input–output models for environmental life-cycle assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32 (1998), 184A–191A, 10.1021/es983471i.
Hendrickson, C.T., Lave, L.B., Matthews, H.S., Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input-Output Approach. 1st Editio. ed., 2006, Routledge.
Hoppe, W., Thonemann, N., Bringezu, S., Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide-based production of methane and methanol and derived polymers. J. Ind. Ecol. 22 (2018), 327–340, 10.1111/jiec.12583.
Huijbregts, M.A.J., Gilijamse, W., Ragas, A.M.J., Reijnders, L., Evaluating uncertainty in environmental life-cycle assessment. A case study comparing two insulation options for a dutch one-family dwelling. Environ. Sci. Tec 37 (2003), 2600–2608 https://doi.org/10.1021/es020971+.
Huijbregts, M.A.J., Steinmann, Z.J., Elshout, P.M.F., Stam, G., Verones, F., Vieira, M.D.M., Zijp, M., van Zelm, R., 2016. ReCiPe 2016: a harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and enpoint level - Report 1: characterization.
International Organization for Standardisation, 2006. IS/ISO 14044 (2006): environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Requirements and Guidelines, ISO 14044:2006. https://doi.org/2009.
Jolliet, O., Saadé-Sbeih, M., Shaked, S., Jolliet, A., Crettaz, P., Environmental Life Cycle Assessment. 2016, CRC Press - Taylor & Francis Group.
Khallaghi, N., Hanak, D.P., Manovic, V., Techno-economic evaluation of near-zero CO2 emission gas-fired power generation technologies: a review. J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng., 74, 2020, 103095, 10.1016/j.jngse.2019.103095.
Khoo, H.H., Isoni, V., Sharratt, P.N., LCI data selection criteria for a multidisciplinary research team: LCA applied to solvents and chemicals. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 16 (2018), 68–87, 10.1016/j.spc.2018.06.002.
Leontief, W., Environmental repercussions and the economic structure: an input-output approach. Rev. Econ. Stat., 52, 1970, 262, 10.2307/1926294.
Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pörtner, H.-O., Roberts, D., Skea, J., Shukla, P.R., Pirani, A., Moufouma-Okia, W., Péan, C., Pidcock, R., Connors, S., Matthews, J.B.R., Chen, Y., Zhou, X., Gomis, M.I., Lonnoy, E., Maycock, T., Tignor, M., Waterfield, T., 2018. Global Warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 °C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty.
Matzen, M., Demirel, Y., Methanol and dimethyl ether from renewable hydrogen and carbon dioxide: alternative fuels production and life-cycle assessment. J. Clean. Prod. J. 139 (2016), 1068–1077, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.163.
Mendoza Beltran, A., Prado, V., Font Vivanco, D., Henriksson, P.J.G., Guinée, J.B., Heijungs, R., Quantified uncertainties in comparative life cycle assessment: what can be concluded?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52 (2018), 2152–2161, 10.1021/acs.est.7b06365.
Meunier, N., Chauvy, R., Mouhoubi, S., Thomas, D., De Weireld, G., Alternative production of methanol from industrial CO2. Renew. Energy 146 (2020), 1192–1203, 10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.010.
Meylan, F.D., Piguet, F.P., Erkman, S., Power-to-gas through CO2 methanation: assessment of the carbon balance regarding EU directives. J. Energy Storage 11 (2017), 16–24, 10.1016/j.est.2016.12.005.
Müller, L.J., Kätelhön, A., Bachmann, M., Zimmermann, A., Sternberg, A., Bardow, A., A Guideline for life cycle assessment of carbon capture and utilization. Front. Energy Res. 8 (2020), 1–20, 10.3389/fenrg.2020.00015.
Reiter, G., Lindorfer, J., Global warming potential of hydrogen and methane production from renewable electricity via power-to-gas technology. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 2015, 477–489, 10.1007/s11367-015-0848-0.
Rochelle, G.T., Amine scrubbing for CO2 capture. Science 325:5948 (2009), 1652–1654, 10.1126/science.1176731.
Rochelle, G.T., Conventional Amine Scrubbing For CO2 capture. Absorption-Based Post-Combustion Capture of Carbon Dioxide, 2016, Elsevier, 10.1016/B978-0-08-100514-9.00003-2.
Schakel, W., Fernández-Dacosta, C., van der Spek, M., Ramirez, A., New indicator for comparing the energy performance of CO2 utilization concepts. J. CO2 Util. 22 (2017), 278–288, 10.1016/j.jcou.2017.10.001.
Schildhauer, T.J., Biollaz, S.M.A., Synthetic Natural Gas from Coal, Dry Biomass, and Power-to-Gas Applications. 2016, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, USA, 10.1002/9781119191339.
Schmidt, O., Gambhir, A., Staffell, I., Hawkes, A., Nelson, J., Few, S., Future cost and performance of water electrolysis: an expert elicitation study. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 42 (2017), 30470–30492, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.045.
Sharifian, S., Sotudeh-Gharebagh, R., Zarghami, R., Tanguy, P., Mostoufi, N., Uncertainty in chemical process systems engineering: a critical review. Rev. Chem. Eng. 37:6 (2019), 687–714, 10.1515/revce-2018-0067.
Shavalieva, G., Kazepidis, P., Papadopoulos, A.I., Seferlis, P., Papadokonstantakis, S., Environmental, health and safety assessment of post-combustion CO2 capture processes with phase-change solvents. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 25 (2021), 60–76, 10.1016/j.spc.2020.07.015.
Sherwood, J., Clabeaux, R., Carbajales-Dale, M., An extended environmental input–output lifecycle assessment model to study the urban food–energy–water nexus. Environ. Res. Lett., 12, 2017, 105003, 10.1088/1748-9326/aa83f0.
Shirmohammadi, R., Aslani, A., Ghasempour, R., Romeo, L.M., Petrakopoulou, F., Process design and thermoeconomic evaluation of a CO2 liquefaction process driven by waste exhaust heat recovery for an industrial CO2 capture and utilization plant. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 145 (2021), 1585–1597, 10.1007/s10973-021-10833-z.
Stadler, K., Wood, R., Bulavskaya, T., Södersten, C.-J., Simas, M., Schmidt, S., Usubiaga, A., Acosta-Fernández, J., Kuenen, J., Bruckner, M., Giljum, S., Lutter, S., Merciai, S., Schmidt, J.H., Theurl, M.C., Plutzar, C., Kastner, T., Eisenmenger, N., Erb, K.-.H., de Koning, A., Tukker, A., EXIOBASE 3: developing a time series of detailed environmentally extended multi-regional input-output tables. J. Ind. Ecol. 22 (2018), 502–515, 10.1111/jiec.12715.
Sternberg, A., Bardow, A., Life cycle assessment of power-to-gas: syngas vs methane. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 4 (2016), 4156–4165, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00644.
Sternberg, A., Bardow, A., Power-to-What? - environmental assessment of energy storage systems. Energy Environ. Sci. 8 (2015), 389–400, 10.1039/C4EE03051F.
Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, EcoInvent v3. URL http://www.ecoinvent.org/ (accessed 14.10.20).
Thema, M., Bauer, F., Sterner, M., Power-to-Gas: electrolysis and methanation status review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 112 (2019), 775–787, 10.1016/j.rser.2019.06.030.
Thonemann, M.A.N., Environmental impacts of CO2-based chemical production: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Appl. Energy, 263, 2020, 114599, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114599.
Towler, G., Sinnott, R., Capital cost estimating. Chemical Engineering Design: Principles, Practice and Economics of Plant and Process Design, 2013, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
US DoS, 2021. US–China Joint Glasgow Declaration on Enhancing Climate Action in the 2020s, Press release from the US Department of State, 2021.
van der Spek, M., Ramirez, A., Faaij, A., Improving uncertainty evaluation of process models by using pedigree analysis. A case study on CO2 capture with monoethanolamine. Comput. Chem. Eng. 85 (2016), 1–15, 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2015.10.006.
van der Spek, M., Roussanaly, S., Rubin, E.S., Best practices and recent advances in CCS cost engineering and economic analysis. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 83 (2019), 91–104, 10.1016/j.ijggc.2019.02.006.
van Leeuwen, C., Mulder, M., Power-to-gas in electricity markets dominated by renewables. Appl. Energy 232 (2018), 258–272, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.217.
Voldsund, M., Gardarsdottir, S.O., De Lena, E., Pérez-Calvo, J.-.F., Jamali, A., Berstad, D., Fu, C., Romano, M., Roussanaly, S., Anantharaman, R., Hoppe, H., Sutter, D., Mazzotti, M., Gazzani, M., Cinti, G., Jordal, K., Comparison of technologies for CO2 capture from cement production—Part 1: technical evaluation. Energies, 12, 2019, 559, 10.3390/en12030559.
von der Assen, N., Jung, J., Bardow, A., Life-cycle assessment of carbon dioxide capture and utilization: avoiding the pitfalls. Energy Environ. Sci., 6, 2013, 2721, 10.1039/c3ee41151f.
von der Assen, N., Voll, P., Peters, M., Bardow, A., Life cycle assessment of CO2 capture and utilization: a tutorial review. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43 (2014), 7982–7994, 10.1039/c3cs60373c.
Wrisberg, M., Lindeijer, E., Mulders, P., Ram, A., van der Ven, B., van der Wel, H., A semi-quantitative approach for assessing data quality in LCA. 7th Annual Meeting of SETAC-Europe, Amsterdam, 1997 April 6-10 1997.
Zhang, X., Bauer, C., Mutel, C.L., Volkart, K., Life cycle assessment of Power-to-Gas: approaches, system variations and their environmental implications. Appl. Energy 190 (2017), 326–338, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.098.
Zhang, X., Witte, J., Schildhauer, T., Bauer, C., Life cycle assessment of power-to-gas with biogas as the carbon source. Sustain. Energy Fuels 4 (2020), 1427–1436, 10.1039/c9se00986h.
Zimmermann, A., Wang, Y., Wunderlich, J., Buchner, G., Schomäcker, R., Müller, L., Langhorst, T., Kätelhön, A., Bachmann, M., Sternberg, A., Bardow, A., Armstrong, K., Michailos, S., McCord, S., Zaragoza, A.V., Styring, P., Naims, H., Cremonese, L., Strunge, T., Olfe-Kräutlein, B., Faber, G., Mangin, C., Mason, F., Stokes, G., Williams, E., Sick, V., 2020. Techno-Economic Assessment & Life Cycle Assessment Guidelines for CO2 Utilization (Version 1.1). https://doi.org/10.3998/2027.42/16257.