Optimizing Internal Energy Streams in Micro Gas Turbines in Cogeneration toward Flexible Heat-to-Power Ratio—Global Thermodynamic Performance Assessment and Specific Case Studies
De paepe, Ward; Clymans, Tom
2023 • In Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 145 (5), p. 051023
Mechanical Engineering; Energy Engineering and Power Technology; Aerospace Engineering; Fuel Technology; Nuclear Energy and Engineering
Abstract :
[en] Abstract
Although the simultaneous production of heat and power, the so-called combined heat and power (CHP), is from a thermodynamic point of view still the most efficient energy conversion method, cogeneration units have nowadays problems to position themselves in the current and future energy market. The increasing renewable energy penetration requires CHP units to become more flexible, especially on their currently fixed heat-to-power ratio. Within this framework, micro-gas turbines (mGTs), as small-scale decentralized cogeneration units, offer opportunities. Since they use the recuperated Brayton cycle, they offer the theoretic option to adjust the internal heat streams to provide a flexible heat-to-power ratio as well as the unique feature of a tunable outlet temperature, making the unit feasible/interesting for a larger range of applications having a combined heat and power demand. Hence, in this paper, we assessed the impact of the use of a recuperator bypass for enhanced operational flexibility of mGT. In a first step, the optimal pathway for the recuperator bypass, i.e., cold or hot side bypass, is selected for a typical mGT, the Turbec T100 (currently commercially available as the AE-T100), considering both thermodynamics as well as technological feasibility. Moreover, the potential performance impact on the electrical and total efficiency is calculated as well as on the total available thermal power. In a second step, the specific performance of the option of using a recuperator bypass is assessed for two specific cases: flexible heat-to-power ratio at low temperature and high temperature, i.e., steam generation, cogeneration. Thermodynamic simulations show that the impact on the electric efficiency remains rather limited (maximal 6% absolute efficiency reduction for a 40% bypass ratio), while the available thermal energy and exergy increase significantly: up to 60% increase for thermal power and even 115% increase in the exergy content of the flue gases. Moreover, there is no distinct difference between cold or hot bypass, leaving the selection of the optimal bypass route a pure technical choice. Finally, considering the specific cases studied, simulation results show that heat-to-power ratio could be increased by more than 50% for all power outputs for the low temperature CHP applications, even resulting in a global efficiency increase, while for the high temperature case, recuperator bypass allows for a significant increase in steam production, at total efficiencies comparable to the separate production (i.e., boiler and grid), clearly highlighting the benefits and potential of a recuperator bypass.
Disciplines :
Energy
Author, co-author :
De paepe, Ward ; Université de Mons - UMONS > Faculté Polytechniqu > Service de Thermique et Combustion
Optimizing Internal Energy Streams in Micro Gas Turbines in Cogeneration toward Flexible Heat-to-Power Ratio—Global Thermodynamic Performance Assessment and Specific Case Studies
European Commission, 2011, “The 2020 Climate and Energy Package,” European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, accessed Nov. 22, 2022, https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/climate-strategies-targets/2020-climate-energy-package_en
European Commission, 2014, “2030 framework for climate and energy policies,” European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, accessed Nov. 22, 2022, https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/climate-strategies-targets/2030-climateenergy-framework_en
International Energy Agency (IEA), 2020, “Renewable 2020: Analysis and Forecast to 2025,” International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, accessed Apr. 2, 2021, https://www.iea.org/reports/renewables-2020
International Energy Agency (IEA), 2020, “Hydrogen: More Efforts Needed,” International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris, France, accessed Apr. 2, 2021, https://www.iea.org/reports/hydrogen#tracking-progress2020
Burre, J., Bongartz, D., Bree, L., Roh, K., and Mitsos, A., 2020, “Power-to-x: Between Electricity Storage, e-Production, and Demand Side Management,” Chem. Ing. Tech., 92(1–2), pp. 74–84.
Sternberg, A., and Bardow, A., 2015, “Power-to-What?–Environmental Assessment of Energy Storage Systems,” Energy Environ. Sci., 8(2), pp. 389–400.
Brynolf, S., Taljegard, M., Grahn, M., and Hansson, J., 2018, “Electrofuels for the Transport Sector: A Review of Production Costs,” Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 81, pp. 1887–1905.
European Commission, 2014. “Strategic Energy Technology Plan,” European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, accessed Apr. 1, 2021, https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/technology-and-innovation/strategic-energy-technology-plan_en
Frost & Sullivan, 2011, “Combined Heat and Power: Integrating Biomass Technologies in Buildings for Efficient Energy Consumption,” San Antonio, TX.
Montero Carrero, M., De Paepe, W., Bram, S., Musin, F., Parente, A., and Contino, F., 2016, “Humidified Micro Gas Turbines for Domestic Users: An Economic and Primary Energy Savings Analysis,” Energy, 117(2), pp. 429–438.
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy, Office of Power Technologies, 2000, “Advanced Microturbine Systems – Program Plan for Fiscal Years 2000 Through 2006,” accessed Sept. 14, 2014, http://www.energetics.com/resourcecenter/products/plans/samples/Documents/advanced_microturbine_plan.pdf
Haile, S. M., 2003, “Materials for Fuel Cells,” Mater. Today, 6(3), pp. 24–29.
Movahed, P., and Avami, A., 2020, “Techno-Economic Optimization of Biogas-Fueled Micro Gas Turbine Cogeneration Systems in Sewage Treatment Plant,” Energy Convers. Manage., 218, p. 112965.
Basrawi, F., Ibrahim, T. K., Habib, K., Yamada, T., and Daing Idris, D. M. N., 2017, “Techno-Economic Performance of Biogas-Fueled Micro Gas Turbine Cogeneration Systems in Sewage Treatment Plants: Effect of Prime Mover Generation Capacity,” Energy, 124, pp. 238–248.
Guo, Y., Yu, Z., Li, G., and Zhao, H., 2020, “Performance Assessment and Optimization of an Integrated Solid Oxide Fuel Cell-Gas Turbine Cogeneration System,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 45(35), pp. 17702–17716.
Cameretti, M. C., De Robbio, R., Pirone, E., and Tuccillo, R., 2017, “Thermo-Economic Analysis of a Hybrid Solar Micro Gas Turbine Power Plant,” Energy Procedia, 126, pp. 667–674.
Delattin, F., Bram, S., Knoops, S., and De Ruyck, J., 2008, “Effects of Steam Injection on Microturbine Efficiency and Performance,” Energy, 33(2), pp. 241–247.
De Paepe, W., Montero Carrero, M., Bram, S., Parente, A., and Contino, F., 2018, “Towards Higher Micro Gas Turbine Efficiency and Flexibility—Humidified mGTs: A Review,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 140(8), p. 081702.
De Ruyck, J., Bram, S., and Allard, G., 1997, “REVAPVR Cycle: A New Evaporative Cycle Without Saturation Tower,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 119(4), pp. 893–897.
Wicker, K., 2003, “Life Below the Wet Bulb: The Maisotsenko Cycle,” Power, 147(9), p. 29.
Lee, J. J., Jeon, M. S., and Kim, T. S., 2010, “The Influence of Water and Steam Injection on the Performance of a Recuperated Cycle Microturbine for Combined Heat and Power Application,” Appl. Energy, 87(4), pp. 1307–1316.
Parente, J., Traverso, A., and Massardo, A. F., 2003, “Micro Humid Air Cycle: Part A–Thermodynamic and Technical Aspects,” ASME Paper No. GT2003-38326.
De Paepe, W., Delattin, F., Bram, S., and De Ruyck, J., 2012, “Steam Injection Experiments in a Microturbine—A Thermodynamic Performance Analysis,” Appl. Energy, 97, pp. 569–576.
Xu, Z., Lu, Y., Wang, B., Zhao, L., Chen, C., and Xiao, Y., 2019, “Experimental Evaluation of 100 kW Grade Micro Humid Air Turbine Cycles Converted From a Microturbine,” Energy, 175, pp. 687–693.
Stathopoulos, P., and Paschereit, C. O., 2016, “Operational Strategies of Wet Cycle Micro Gas Turbines and Their Economic Evaluation,” ASME J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 138(12), p. 122301.
Van Nest, F. H., 1959, “Control of Heat Supply to Heat Recovery Boiler of Regenerative Cycle Gas Turbine Powerplant,” U.S. Patent No. 2,914,917.
Ibrahim, O., Zimmermann, P., Hirsch, C., Sattelmayer, T., Gerhard, B., and Steinbach, C., 2004, “A Microturbine Operating With Variable Heat Output,” ASME Paper No. GT2004-53011.
Kang, S., Kim, J., and Kim, T., 2013, “Influence of Steam Injection and Hot Gas Bypass on the Performance and Operation of a Combined Heat and Power System Using a Recuperative Cycle Gas Turbine,” J. Mech. Sci. Technol., 27(8), pp. 2547–2555.
Sadeghi, E., Khaledi, H., and Ghofrani, M. B., 2006, “Thermodynamic Analysis of Different Configurations for Microturbine Cycles in Simple and Cogeneration Systems,” ASME Paper No. GT2006-90237.
Rist, J. F., Dias, M. F., Palman, M., Zelazo, D., and Cukurel, B., 2017, “Economic Dispatch of a Single Micro-Gas Turbine Under CHP Operation,” Appl. Energy, 200, pp. 1–18.
De Paepe, W., Montero Carrero, M., Giorgetti, S., Parente, A., Bram, S., and Contino, F., 2016, “Exhaust Gas Recirculation on Humidified Flexible Micro Gas Turbines for Carbon Capture Applications,” ASME Paper No. GT2016-57265.
Renzi, M., Caresana, F., Pelagalli, L., and Comodi, G., 2014, “Enhancing Micro Gas Turbine Performance Through Fogging Technique: Experimental Analysis,” Appl. Energy, 135, pp. 165–173.
Turbec, A. B., 2000–2001, T100 Microturbine CHP System: Technical Description, Version 4.0, Malmö, Sweden.
Kim, M. J., Kim, J. H., and Kim, T. S., 2018, “The Effects of Internal Leakage on the Performance of a Micro Gas Turbine,” Appl. Energy, 212, pp. 175–184.
De Paepe, W., Montero Carrero, M., Bram, S., Contino, F., and Parente, A., 2017, “Waste Heat Recovery Optimization in Micro Gas Turbine Applications Using Advanced Humidified Gas Turbine Cycle Concepts,” Appl. Energy, 207, pp. 218–229.
Lagerström, G., and Xie, M., 2002, “High Performance and Cost Effective Recuperator for Micro-Gas Turbines,” ASME Paper No. GT2002-30402.
Xiao, G., Yang, T., Liu, H., Ni, D., Ferrari, M. L., Li, M., Luo, Z., Cen, K., and Ni, M., 2017, “Recuperators for Micro Gas Turbines: A Review,” Appl. Energy, 197, pp. 83–99.
O’Brien, J. E., and Sparrow, E. M., 1982, “Corrugated-Duct Heat Transfer, Pressure Drop, and Flow Visualization,” ASME J. Heat Transfer, 104(3), pp. 410–416.
Sparrow, E., and Comb, J., 1983, “Effect of Interwall Spacing and Fluid Flow Inlet Conditions on a Corrugated-Wall Heat Exchanger,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 26(7), pp. 993–1005.
Vlasogiannis, P., Karagiannis, G., Argyropoulos, P., and Bontozoglou, V., 2002, “Air-Water Two-Phase Flow and Heat Transfer in a Plate Heat Exchanger,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 28(5), pp. 757–772.
Montero Carrero, M., De Paepe, W., Magnusson, J., Parente, A., Bram, S., and Contino, F., 2017, “Experimental Characterisation of a Micro Humid Air Turbine: Assessment of the Thermodynamic Performance,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 118, pp. 796–806.
Centrica Business Solutions, 2017, “Natural Gas CHP Range Guide 2017 UK & Ireland,” Centrica Business Solutions, accessed Nov. 22, 2022, https://cdn.centricabusinesssolutions.com/sites/g/files/qehiga126/files/CBS_DS_Natural%20-Gas%20 Range_Datasheet_A4_LS_RGB.pdf
Blondeau, J., and Mertens, J., 2019, “Impact of Intermittent Renewable Energy Production on Specific CO2 and NOx Emissions From Large Scale Gas-Fired Combined Cycles,” J. Cleaner Prod., 221, pp. 261–270.
McDonald, C. F., 2003, “Recuperator Considerations for Future Higher Efficiency Microturbines,” Appl. Therm. Eng., 23(12), pp. 1463–1487.
Simpson, M. C., Chatzopoulou, M. A., Oyewunmi, O. A., Le Brun, N., Sapin, P., and Markides, C. N., 2019, “Technoeconomic Analysis of Internal Combustion Engine — Organic Rankine Cycle Systems for Combined Heat and Power in Energy-Intensive Buildings,” Appl. Energy, 253, p. 113462.
De Paepe, W., Delattin, F., Bram, S., Contino, F., and De Ruyck, J., 2013, “A Study on the Performance of Steam Injection in a Typical Micro Gas Turbine,” ASME Paper No. GT2013-94569.
