Article (Scientific journals)
Frailty detection by healthcare professionals: a systematic review of the available English and French tools and their validation.
Bamps, Julien; Capouillez, Bastien; Rinaldi, Romina et al.
2023In European Geriatric Medicine
Peer reviewed
 

Files


Full Text
c00be4fc-5e44-4fb0-a04e-d6ec07ebb74c.pdf
Author postprint (1.68 MB) Creative Commons License - Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative
Download
Annexes
Online resource 1 - Complete search strategy.pdf
(153.48 kB) Creative Commons License - Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative
Request a copy
Online resource 2 - Individual QUADAS-2 evaluation.pdf
(195.04 kB) Creative Commons License - Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative
Request a copy
Online resource 3 - Data of the clinimetric properties.xlsx
(28.41 kB) Creative Commons License - Attribution, Non-Commercial, No Derivative
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi UMONS are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Evaluation tool; Frailty; Geriatric assessment; Older adults; Screening; Automotive Engineering
Abstract :
[en] [en] BACKGROUND: There is a wide variety of frailty detection tools, but no gold standard. Choosing the most appropriate tool can therefore be complicated. Our systematic review seeks to provide useful data on the frailty detection tools available to help healthcare professionals in choosing a tool. METHOD: We systematically searched for articles published between January 2001 and December 2022 in three electronic databases. Articles were to be written in English or French and were to discuss a frailty detection tool used by healthcare professionals in a population without specific health conditions. Any self-testing, physical testing or biomarkers were excluded. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses were also excluded. Data were extracted from two coding grids; one for the criteria used by the tools to detect frailty and the other for the evaluation of clinimetric parameters. The quality of the articles was assessed using QUADAS-2. RESULTS: A total of 52 articles, covering 36 frailty detection tools, were included and analysed in the systematic review. Forty-nine different criteria were identified, with a median of 9 (IQR 6-15) criteria per tool. Regarding the evaluation of tool performances, 13 different clinimetric properties were identified, with a mean of 3.6 (± 2.2) properties assessed per tool. CONCLUSION: There is considerable heterogeneity in the criteria used to detect frailty, as well as in the way tools are evaluated.
Disciplines :
Geriatrics
Author, co-author :
Bamps, Julien  ;  Université de Mons - UMONS > Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie > Pharmacie Clinique
Capouillez, Bastien;  Clinical Pharmacy Unit, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, University of Mons (UMONS), Chemin du Champ de Mars, 25, Bât. 6, 7000, Mons, Belgium
Rinaldi, Romina  ;  Université de Mons - UMONS > Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education > Service d'Orthopédagogie clinique ; Université de Mons - UMONS
Patris, Stéphanie  ;  Université de Mons - UMONS > Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie > Pharmacie Clinique
Language :
English
Title :
Frailty detection by healthcare professionals: a systematic review of the available English and French tools and their validation.
Publication date :
06 June 2023
Journal title :
European Geriatric Medicine
ISSN :
1878-7649
eISSN :
1878-7657
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, Switzerland
Peer reviewed :
Peer reviewed
Research unit :
M110 - Pharmacie Clinique
Research institute :
R550 - Institut des Sciences et Technologies de la Santé
Available on ORBi UMONS :
since 07 June 2023

Statistics


Number of views
23 (11 by UMONS)
Number of downloads
40 (4 by UMONS)

Scopus citations®
 
4
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
4
OpenCitations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi UMONS