Download

Full Text

• Ahrens, J. P., Landmann, A., & Woywode, M., (2015). Gender preferences in the CEO successions of family firms: Family characteristics and human capital of the successor. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(2), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.02.002
• Baltazar, J. R., Fernandes, C. I., Ramadani, V., & Hughes, M., (2023). Family business succession and innovation: A systematic literature review. Review of Managerial Science, 17(8), 2897–2920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00607-8
• Bang, N. P., Calabrò, A., & Valentino, A., (2023). Strategic transitions: Unraveling the impact of socioemotional wealth and generational cohorts on succession planning in family SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 30(1), 23–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-03-2023-0315
• Bauweraerts, J., Cirillo, A., & Sciascia, S., (2024). Socioemotional wealth and tax aggressiveness in private family firms: The role of the CEO’s characteristics. Family Business Review, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865231223562370–395.
• Bauweraerts, J., Rondi, E., Rovelli, P., De Massis, A., & Sciascia, S., (2022). Are family female directors catalysts of innovation in family small and medium enterprises?Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 16(2), 314–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1420
• Belling, M., Pidun, U., & Zu Knyphausen-Aufseβ, D., (2022). Restructuring in family firms: Balancing family objectives and economic prosperity. Long Range Planning, 55(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2022.102184102184.
• Bernhard, F., (2024). Pride in family businesses: Authenticity, hubris, and cultural insights. Journal of Business Research, 176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.114597114597.
• Berrone, P., Cruz, C., & Gomez-Mejia, L. R., (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486511435355
• Block, J., Hansen, C., & Steinmetz, H., (2023). Are family firms doing more innovation output with less innovation input? A replication and extension. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(4), 1496–1520. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587221084249
• Byrne, D., (1971). The attraction paradigm academic Press.
• Byrne, D., (1997). An overview (and underview) of research and theory within the attraction paradigm. Journal of Social & Personal Relationships, 14(3), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407597143008
• Calabrò, A., Conti, E., & Masè, S., (2024). Trapped in a “golden cage”! The legitimation of women leadership in family business. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2023.100569
• Calabrò, A., Torchia, M., Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Pongelli, C., & Lohe, F. W., (2025). What are family firms all about? Advancing family business research through socioemotional wealth theory. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13263
• Calabrò, A., Torchia, M., Jimenez, D. G., & Kraus, S., (2021). The role of human capital on family firm innovativeness: The strategic leadership role of family board members. International Entrepreneurship & Management Journal, 17, 261–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00657-y1).
• Calabrò, A., Vecchiarini, M., Gast, J., Campopiano, G., De Massis, A., & Kraus, S., (2019). Innovation in family firms: A systematic literature review and guidance for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 21(3), 317–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12192
• Cambrea, D. R., Ponomareva, Y., Pittino, D., & Minichilli, A., (2022). Strings attached: Socioemotional wealth mixed gambles in the cash management choices of family firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100466100466.
• Cao, F., Wang, W., Lim, E., Liu, X., & Tan, C. W., (2022). Do social dominance-based faultlines help or hurt team performance in crowdsourcing tournaments?Journal of Management Information Systems, 39(1), 247–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2021.2023403
• Casillas, J. C., & Moreno, A. M., (2010). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth: The moderating role of family involvement. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(3–4), 265–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985621003726135
• Cesaroni, F. M., & Sentuti, A., (2014). Women and family businesses. When women are left only minor roles. The History of the Family, 19(3), 358–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/1081602X.2014.929019
• Chadwick, I. C., & Dawson, A., (2018). Women leaders and firm performance in family businesses: An examination of financial and nonfinancial outcomes. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 9(4), 238–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.10.002
• Chen, X., Liu, J., Zhang, H., & Kwan, H. K., (2019). Cognitive diversity and innovative work behaviour: The mediating roles of task reflexivity and relationship conflict and the moderating role of perceived support. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 92(3), 671–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12259
• Chen, Y., Chen, M., Liu, H., Volberda, H. W., & Heij, C. V., (2024). How does CEO-TMT exchange quality incongruence affect business model innovation? The moderating role of environmental dynamism. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 41(5), 949–971. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12724
• Cherchem, N., (2017). The relationship between organizational culture and entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: Does generational involvement matter?Journal of Family Business Strategy, 8(2), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2017.04.001
• Corten, M., Vandekerkhof, P., & Steijvers, T., (2021). The effect of socioemotional wealth diversity within the top management team on earnings management in private family firms: The moderating role of the board of directors. Managerial and Decision Economics, 42(7), 1886–1896. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3352
• D’Allura, G. M., (2019). The leading role of the top management team in understanding family firms: Past research and future directions. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.12.001
• Dibrell, C., Gamble, J. R., Clinton, E., & Sherlock, C., (2024). Family firm innovativeness: An investigation of family governance, commitment, and generation involvement. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2024.2338171
• Domańska, A., Hernández-Linares, R., Zajkowski, R., & Żukowska, B., (2024). Family firm entrepreneurship and sustainability initiatives: Women as corporate change agents. Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, 33(2), 217–240. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12617
• Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., Van Essen, M., & Zellweger, T., (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224–1264. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0424
• Eddleston, K. A., Kellermanns, F. W., & Collier, G., (2019). Research on family firm innovation: What do family firms actually think and do?Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.100308100308.
• Filser, M., De Massis, A., Gast, J., Kraus, S., & Niemand, T., (2018). Tracing the roots of innovativeness in family SMEs: The effect of family functionality and socioemotional wealth. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(4), 609–628. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12433
• Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F., (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
• Gala, P., Kashmiri, S., & Nicol, C. D., (2024). Female CEOs and corporate social responsibility: Effect of CEO gender on relational and rational CSR. European Journal of Marketing, 58(10), 2129–2168. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2023-0448
• García-Meca, E., & Santana-Martín, D. J., (2023). Board gender diversity and performance in family firms: Exploring the faultline of family ties. Review of Managerial Science, 17(5), 1559–1594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-022-00563-3
• Gast, J., Filser, M., Rigtering, J. C., Harms, R., Kraus, S., & Chang, M. L., (2018). Socioemotional wealth and innovativeness in small-and medium-sized family enterprises: A configuration approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 56(S1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12389
• Georgakakis, D., Ma, Y., Dwivedi, P., & Cannella, A. A.,Jr. (2024). Divided we stand: Top management ideological separation as an impediment to strategic change in turnaround situations. British Journal of Management. 36(3), 1039–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12882
• George, G., (2005). Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 661–676. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2005.17843944
• Gómez-Mejia, L. R., Chirico, F., Martin, G., & Baù, M., (2023). Best among the worst or worst among the best? Socioemotional wealth and risk-performance returns for family and non-family firms under financial distress. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 47(4), 1031–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211057420
• Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J., (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
• Gómez-Mejía, L. R., & Herrero, I., (2022). Back to square one: The measurement of socioemotional wealth (sew). Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100480100480.
• Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M., (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
• Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M., (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2013.01.001
• Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Pieper, T. M., & Ringle, C. M., (2012). The use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in strategic management research: A review of past practices and recommendations for future applications. Long Range Planning, 45(5), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2012.09.008
• Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A., (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
• Harman, H. H., (1960). Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press.
• Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J., (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586096
• Hatak, I., Kautonen, T., Fink, M., & Kansikas, J., (2016). Innovativeness and family-firm performance: The moderating effect of family commitment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 102, 120–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.02.020
• Havrylyshyn, A., Schepker, D. J., & Nyberg, A. J., (2023). In the club? How categorization and contact impact the board gender diversity-firm performance relationship. Journal of Business Ethics, 184(2), 353–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05168-0
• Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M., (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
• Hsueh, J. W. J., De Massis, A., & Gomez-Mejia, L., (2023). Examining heterogeneous configurations of socioemotional wealth in family firms through the formalization of corporate social responsibility strategy. Family Business Review, 36(2), 172–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865221146350
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M., (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Hu, Q., & Hughes, M., (2020). Radical innovation in family firms: A systematic analysis and research agenda. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 26(6), 1199–1234. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2019-0658
• Huybrechts, J., Voordeckers, W., & Lybaert, N., (2013). Entrepreneurial risk taking of private family firms: The influence of a nonfamily CEO and the moderating effect of CEO tenure. Family Business Review, 26(2), 161–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486512469252
• Issah, W. B., Anwar, M., Clauss, T., & Kraus, S., (2023). Managerial capabilities and strategic renewal in family firms in crisis situations: The moderating role of the founding generation. Journal of Business Research, 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113486156.
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G., (1993). Rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306
• Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A., (1999). Why differences make a difference. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667054
• Jiang, D. S., Kellermanns, F. W., Munyon, T. P., & Morris, M. L., (2018). More than meets the eye: A review and future directions for the social psychology of socioemotional wealth. Family Business Review, 31(1), 125–157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517736959
• Kammerlander, N., (2022). Family business and business family questions in the 21st century: Who develops SEW, how do family members create value, and who belongs to the family?Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2021.100470100470.
• Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., Sarathy, R., & Murphy, F., (2012). Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9268-5
• Kerai, A., Kumar, V., & Singla, C., (2023). Impact of TMT structural power asymmetry on family firm internationalization. International Business Review, 32(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2023.102134102134.
• Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J., (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. Jossey-Bass Publishers:
• Kraiczy, N. D., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F. W., (2014). New product portfolio performance in family firms. Journal of Business Research, 67(6), 1065–1073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.06.005
• Kraiczy, N. D., Hack, A., & Kellermanns, F. W., (2015). What makes a family firm innovative? CEO risk-taking propensity and the organizational context of family firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12203
• Küpper, B., Wolf, C., & Zick, A., (2010). Social status and anti-immigrant attitudes in Europe: An examination from the perspective of social dominance theory. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4(2), 205–219.
• Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D., (2008). To grow or to harvest? Governance, strategy and performance in family and lone founder firms. Journal of Strategy and Management, 1(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554250810909419
• Lee, J., (2023). A critical review and theorization of workplace backlash: Looking back and moving forward through the lens of social dominance theory. Human Resource Management Review, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100900100900.
• Liu, J., Zhu, Y., & Wang, H., (2023). Managing the negative impact of workforce diversity: The important roles of inclusive HRM and employee learning-oriented behaviors. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1117690
• Lohmoller, J. B., (1988). The PLS program system: Latent variables path analysis with partial least squares estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23(1), 125–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2301_7
• Lorenzo, D., Núñez-Cacho, P., Akhter, N., & Chirico, F., (2022). Why are some family firms not innovative?: Innovation barriers and path dependence in family firms. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 38(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2021.101182101182.
• Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G., (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172. https://doi.org/10.2307/258632
• Magrelli, V., Rovelli, P., Benedetti, C., Überbacher, R., & De Massis, A., (2022). Generations in family business: A multifield review and future research agenda. Family Business Review, 35(1), 15–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944865211069781
• Maseda, A., Iturralde, T., Cooper, S., & Aparicio, G., (2022). Mapping women’s involvement in family firms: A review based on bibliographic coupling analysis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 24(2), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12278
• Miller, D., & Friesen, P. H., (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250030102
• Newbert, S., & Craig, J. B., (2017). Moving beyond socioemotional wealth: Toward a normative theory of decision making in family business. Family Business Review, 30(4), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894486517733572
• Ng, P. Y., Dayan, M., & Makri, M., (2022). Influence of socioemotional wealth on non-family managers’ risk taking and product innovation in family businesses. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 29(2), 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCSM-03-2021-0058
• Ng, P. Y., & Hamilton, R. T., (2024). Socioemotional wealth and the innovativeness of family SMEs in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 36(1), 158–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2021.1926779
• Patel, P. C., & Cooper, D., (2014). Structural power equality between family and non-family TMT members and the performance of family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1624–1649. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0681
• Pielsticker, D. I., & Hiebl, M. R., (2020). Survey response rates in family business research. European Management Review, 17(1), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12375
• Pittino, D., Chirico, F., Henssen, B., & Broekaert, W., (2020). Does increased generational involvement foster business growth? The moderating roles of family involvement in ownership and management. European Management Review, 17(3), 785–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12366
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P., (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W., (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408
• Post, C., Lokshin, B., & Boone, C., (2022). What changes after women enter top management teams? A gender-based model of strategic renewal. Academy of Management Journal, 65(1), 273–303. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.1039
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S., (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772
• Reinert, C., Buengeler, C., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., & Homan, A. C., (2025). Reviewing and revisiting the processes and emergent states underlying team diversity effects. Small Group Research, 56(1), 114–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964241275748
• Reynolds, W. M., (1982). Development of reliable and valid short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. The Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38(1), 119–125. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198201)38:1<119::AID-JCLP2270380118>3.0.CO;2-I
• Richard, O. C., Barnett, T., Dwyer, S., & Chadwick, K., (2004). Cultural diversity in management, firm performance, and the moderating role of entrepreneurial orientation dimensions. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159576
• Rondi, E., & Rovelli, P., (2022). Exchanging knowledge in the TMT to realize more innovation opportunities: What can family firms do?Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(2), 350–374. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2020-0645
• Rovelli, P., & Mismetti, M., (2025). Breaking the TMT glass ceiling: Myth or reality? Female CEOs, decision authority, and family firms. Journal of Business Research, 192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115324115324.
• Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J. F., (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.01.002
• Scholes, L., Hughes, M., Wright, M., De Massis, A., & Kotlar, J., (2021). Family management and family guardianship: Governance effects on family firm innovation strategy. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100389100389.
• Sciascia, S., Clinton, E., Nason, R. S., James, A. E., & Rivera-Algarin, J. O., (2013). Family communication and innovativeness in family firms. Family Relations, 62(3), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.12014
• Sciascia, S., Mazzola, P., & Kellermanns, F. W., (2014). Family management and profitability in private family-owned firms: Introducing generational stage and the socioemotional wealth perspective. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 5(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2014.03.001
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F., (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press:
• Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., Van Laar, C., & Levin, S., (2004). Social dominance theory: Its agenda and method. Political Psychology, 25(6), 845–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00401.x
• Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A., (2013). Translating team creativity to innovation implementation: The role of team composition and climate for innovation. Journal of Management, 39(3), 684–708. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310394187
• Thatcher, S. M., Meyer, B., Kim, Y., & Patel, P. C., (2024). A meta-analytic integration of the faultlines literature. Organizational Psychology Review, 14(2), 238–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866231225064
• Torchia, M., Calabrò, A., & Huse, M., (2011). Women directors on corporate boards: From tokenism to critical mass. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0815-z
• Triana, M. D. C., Gu, P., Chapa, O., Richard, O., & Colella, A., (2021). Sixty years of discrimination and diversity research in human resource management: A review with suggestions for future research directions. Human Resource Management, 60(1), 145–204. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22052
• Vandekerkhof, P., Steijvers, T., Hendriks, W., & Voordeckers, W., (2018). Socio-emotional wealth separation and decision-making quality in family firm TMTs: The moderating role of psychological safety. Journal of Management Studies, 55(4), 648–676. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12277
• Vandekerkhof, P., Steijvers, T., Hendriks, W., & Voordeckers, W., (2019). The effect of nonfamily managers on decision-making quality in family firm TMTs: The role of intra-TMT power asymmetries. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2019.01.002100272.
• van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Homan, A. C., (2004). Work group diversity and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008–1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1008
• van Knippenberg, D., Li, J., & Tu, Y., (2024). Team informational resources, information elaboration, and team innovation: Diversity mindset moderating functional diversity and boundary spanning scouting effects. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 97(4), 1835–1853. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12541
• van Knippenberg, D., & van Ginkel, W. P., 2010. The categorization-elaboration model of work group diversity: Wielding the double-edged sword. InR. J. Crisp, (Ed.), The Psychology of Social and Cultural Diversity (pp. 255–280). Wiley-Blackwell.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444325447.ch11
• Vardaman, J. M., & Gondo, M. B., (2014). Socioemotional wealth conflict in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1317–1322. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12126
• Vardaman, J. M., McLarty, B. D., & Carter, M. Z., (2025). All is well until it isn’t: Socioemotional wealth congruence and employee behavior in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 49(2), 435–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587241270638
• Vesal, M., Alam, M. A., & Rahmati, M. H., (2025). Blending minds, balancing goals: TMT heterogeneity and sustainable-innovation in family firms. Journal of Small Business Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2025.24957881–32.
• Wang, J. C., Zhao, Y., Sun, S. L., & Zhu, J., (2023). Female-friendly boards in family firms. Journal of Business Research, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113552157.
• Wang, Y., & Poutziouris, P., (2010). Entrepreneurial risk taking: Empirical evidence from UK family firms. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 16(5), 370–388. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551011071841
• Wei, X., Yang, H., & Han, S., (2021). A meta-analysis of top management team compositional characteristics and corporate innovation in China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 27(1), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2021.1846952
• Yang, X., Shang, H., Li, W., & Lan, H., (2024). How does family ownership and management influence green innovation of family firms: Evidence from China. European Journal of Innovation Management, 27(1), 170–192. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-01-2022-0033