Article (Scientific journals)
A systematic review of machine learning findings in PTSD and their relationships with theoretical models.
Blekic, Wivine; D'Hondt, Fabien; Shalev, Arieh Y et al.
2025In Nature Mental Health, 3 (1), p. 139 - 158
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
2025_Blekic_ML_PTSD.pdf
Author postprint (3.56 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi UMONS are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Molecular Medicine; Psychiatry and Mental Health; Neuroscience (miscellaneous); Biological Psychiatry
Abstract :
[en] In recent years, the application of machine learning (ML) techniques in research on the prediction of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has increased. However, concerns regarding the clinical relevance and generalizability of ML findings hamper their implementation by clinicians and researchers. Here in this systematic review we examined (1) the extent to which pre-, peri- and post-traumatic risk factors identified using ML approaches coincide with the theoretical understanding of the disorder; (2) whether new insights were gained through ML techniques; and (3) whether ML findings, combined with previous research, enable an integrative model of PTSD risk encompassing both predictor categories and their theoretical relevance. We reviewed ML studies on PTSD risk factors in PubMed, Web of Science and Scopus. Studies were included if they specified when predictors and PTSD symptoms were collected in temporal relation to the traumatic event. A total of 30 studies with 12,908 participants (mean age 36.5 years) were included. After extracting the 15 most important predictors from all studies, we categorized them into pre-, peri- and post-trauma exposure predictors and examined their associations with established theoretical models of PTSD. Many studies exhibited a risk of bias, assessed using the prediction model risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST). However, we found overlaps in identified predictors across studies, a concordance between data-driven results and theory-driven research, and underexplored predictors identified through ML. We propose an integrative model of PTSD risk that incorporates both data-driven and theory-driven findings and discuss future directions. We emphasize the importance of standards on how to apply and report ML approaches for mental health.
Disciplines :
Theoretical & cognitive psychology
Treatment & clinical psychology
Psychiatry
Engineering, computing & technology: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Author, co-author :
Blekic, Wivine  ;  Université de Mons - UMONS > Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education > Service de Psychologie cognitive et Neuropsychologie ; Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1172-LilNCog-Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille, France
D'Hondt, Fabien ;  Univ. Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, U1172-LilNCog-Lille Neuroscience & Cognition, Lille, France ; Centre national de ressources et de résilience Lille-Paris, Lille, France
Shalev, Arieh Y;  Department of Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
Schultebraucks, Katharina ;  Department of Psychiatry, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA ; Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
Language :
English
Title :
A systematic review of machine learning findings in PTSD and their relationships with theoretical models.
Publication date :
January 2025
Journal title :
Nature Mental Health
eISSN :
2731-6076
Publisher :
Springer Nature, England
Volume :
3
Issue :
1
Pages :
139 - 158
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Research unit :
P325 - Psychologie cognitive et Neuropsychologie
Research institute :
R550 - Institut des Sciences et Technologies de la Santé
Funders :
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Funding text :
K.S. received support from the National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH129856) and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL156134). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
Available on ORBi UMONS :
since 31 December 2025

Statistics


Number of views
30 (1 by UMONS)
Number of downloads
162 (0 by UMONS)

Scopus citations®
 
5
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
5
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
6

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi UMONS