Article (Scientific journals)
Post-operative delirium risk estimation and assessment with machine learning: development and validation of the Open-DREAM Model: A peri-operative dataset analysis.
Berger, Armin; Gisselbaek, Mia; Saxena, Sarah et al.
2026In European Journal of Anaesthesiology
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
post_operative_delirium_risk_estimation_and.417.pdf
Author postprint (1.38 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi UMONS are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] [en] BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common and serious complication in older surgical patients, associated with increased morbidity, prolonged hospitalisation and increased healthcare costs. Existing predictive models have limited clinical adoption due to implementation costs, suboptimal accuracy and poor generalisability. OBJECTIVES: To develop an open-access, interpretable machine learning (ML) model using only preoperative data to predict the risk of POD in patients aged at least 60 years undergoing surgery. DESIGN: Observational diagnostic study using prospectively collected routine care data. SETTING: Single secondary care hospital in Switzerland, January 2023 to January 2024. PATIENTS: A total of 1425 patients were screened; 748 met the inclusion criteria (≥60 years, noncardiac, nonintracranial surgery, no preoperative delirium). INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: POD, defined as a Nursing Delirium Screening Scale (Nu-DESC) score at least 2 at any peri-operative assessment. RESULTS: Three ML algorithms were trained and compared: Support Vector Machines; Logistic Regression and XGBoost. The calibrated XGBoost model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.80, with a sensitivity of 0.89 at the optimal probability threshold of 0.35. Feature selection using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-derived rankings reduced the predictor set from 55 to 15 features without loss of AUC. Type of anaesthesia (spinal vs. general) was the strongest predictor. CONCLUSIONS: An open-access ML-based model using routinely collected preoperative variables can predict POD with high sensitivity and preserved interpretability. External validation is warranted. Future research should explore causal inference for modifiable risk factors, acknowledging the limitations of observational data. This open-access application is currently intended for research and educational use only until external validation confirms its performance in independent patient groups.
Disciplines :
Anesthesia & intensive care
Author, co-author :
Berger, Armin;  From the ETH AI Center, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETH Zurich), Zürich (AB, AD), Division of Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Pharmacology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine (MG), Unit of Development and Research in Medical Education (UDREM), Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland (MG), Department of Anesthesiology, Helora (SS), Department of Surgery, UMons, Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons, Mons, Belgium (SS), Institute for Medical Education, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (JBE), RISE-Health, Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, Porto, Portugal (JBE) and Institute for Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Salem Spital, Hirslanden Medical Group, Bern, Switzerland (JBE
Gisselbaek, Mia
Saxena, Sarah  ;  Université de Mons - UMONS > Faculté de Médecine, Pharmacie et Sciences Biomédicales > Service du Doyen de la Faculté de Médecine, Pharmacie et Sciences Biomédicales
Berger-Estilita, Joana
Devos, Arnout
Language :
English
Title :
Post-operative delirium risk estimation and assessment with machine learning: development and validation of the Open-DREAM Model: A peri-operative dataset analysis.
Publication date :
28 April 2026
Journal title :
European Journal of Anaesthesiology
ISSN :
0265-0215
eISSN :
1365-2346
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), England
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Research unit :
Surgery
Research institute :
Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology
Available on ORBi UMONS :
since 03 May 2026

Statistics


Number of views
31 (0 by UMONS)
Number of downloads
181 (0 by UMONS)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
0
OpenAlex citations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi UMONS