Anisfeld, M.: Only tongue protrusion modelling is matched, by neonates. Dev. Rev. 16: 149-161 (1996).
Auer, P.; Hinskens, F.: The role of interpersonal accommodation in a theory of language change; in Auer, Hinskens, Kerswill, Dialect change: convergence and divergence in. European languages, pp. 35-57 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2005).
Bellman, R.E.: Dynamic programming (Princeton University Press, Princeton 1957).
Byrne, R.: The thinking ape: evolutionary origins of intelligence (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1995).
Chartrand, T.L.; Bargh, J.A.: The chameleon effect: the perception-behavior link, and social interaction. J. Pers. soc. Psychol. 76: 893-910(1999).
Chistovich, L.A.; Fant, G.; de Serpa-Leitao, A.; Tjernlund, P.: Mimicking of synthetic vowels. Q. Prog. Status Rep., Speech Transm. Lab., R. Inst. Technol., Stockh., No. 2, pp. 1-18 (1966).
Coupland, N.: Style-shifting in. a Cardiff work-setting. Lang. Soc. 9: 1-12 (1980).
Custance, D.M.: Can young chimpanzees imitate arbitrary actions? Hayes & Hayes (1952) revisited. Behaviour 132:837-859 (1995).
Davis, S.B.; Metmelstein, P.: Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken, sentences. IEEE Trans. on Acoust. Speech Signal Processing 28: 357-366 (1980).
de Boer, B.: Self-organization in vowel systems. J. Phonet. 28: 441-465 (2000).
de Boer, B.: Computer modelling as a tool for understanding language evolution; in. Gontier, Van Bendegem, Aerts, Evolutionary epistemology, language and culture - a nonadaptationist systems theoretical approach. Theory and Decision Library A. vol. 39 (Springer, Dordrecht 2005).
Demolin, D.; Soquet, A.; Delvaux, V.: Mimetic interactions between speakers: an experimental study. Abstr. 15th Int. Congr. Phonet. Sci., Barcelona 2003, p. 128.
Dominicy, M.: La dynamique du système phonologique en français. Le Français Moderne 68: 17-30 (2000).
Donald, M.: Origins of the modern, mind: three stages in. the evolution of culture and cognition (Harvard University Press, Cambridge 1991).
Donald, M. : Précis of Origins of the Modern Mind with multiple reviews and author's response. Behav. Brain Sci. 16:737-791 (1993).
Fitch, W.T.: The evolution, of speech: a comparative review. Trends Cognitive Sci. 4: 258-267 (2000).
Fodor, J.A.: The modularity of mind (MIT Press, Cambridge 1983).
Giles, H.: Accent mobility: a model and some data. Anthrop. Ling. 15: 87-105 (1973).
Giles, H.; Bourhis, RY.: Black speakers with white speech - a real problem? In Nickel, Proc. 4th Int. Congr. Appl. Ling., vol. 1, pp. 575-584 (Hochschul-Verlag, Stuttgart 1976).
Giles, H.; Coupland, N.; Coupland, J.: Accommodation theory: communication, context, and consequence; in Giles, Coupland, Coupland, Contexts of accommodation: developments in. applied sociolinguistics. Studies in emotion and social interaction, pp. 1-68 (Cambridge University Press, New York 1991).
Giles, H.; Smith, P.M.: Accommodation theory: optimal levels of convergence; in Giles, St. Clair, Language and social psychology, pp. 45-65 (Blackwell, Oxford 1979).
Giles, H.; Taylor, D.M.; Bourhis, R.: Towards a theory of interpersonal accommodation, through, language: some Canadian data. Lang. Soc. 2: 177-192 (1973).
Goldinger, S.D.: Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychol. Rev. 105: 251-279 (1998).
Hambye, P. : La prononciation du français contemporain, en. Belgique: variation, normes et identités; thèse Université catholique de Louvain (unpublished, 2005).
Herman, L.M.: Intelligence and rational behaviour in the bottlenosed dolphin; in Nudds, Hurley, Rational animals? pp. 474-497 (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2005).
Heyes, C.M.: Causes and consequences of imitation. Trends Cognitive Sci. 5: 253-261 (2001).
Kent, R.D.: The imitation, of synthetic vowels and some implications for speech memory. Phonetica 28: 1-25 (1973).
Kent, R.D.: Imitation of synthesized English and non English, vowels by children, and adults. J. psycholinguist. Res. 8: 43-60 (1979).
Kingston, J.; Diehl, R.L.: Phonetic knowledge. Language 70: 419-453 (1994).
Kokkinaki, T.: Kugiumutzakis, G.: Basic aspects of vocal imitation in. infant-parent interactions during the first six months. J. reprod. Infant Psychol. 18: 173-187 (2000).
Kuhl, P.K.; Andruski, J.E.; Chistovich, I.A.; Chistovich, L.A.; Kozhevnikova, E.V.; Ryskina, V.L.; Stolyarova, E.I.; Sundberg, U.; Lacerda, F.: Cross-language analysis of phonetic units in language addressed to infants. Science 277: 684-686 (1997).
Kuhl, P.K.; Meltzoff, A.N.: Infant vocalizations in response to speech: vocal imitation and developmental change. J. acoust. Soc. of Am. 100: 2425-2438 (1996).
Labov, W.: The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Lang. Variation Change 2: 205-254 (1990).
Labov, W : Principles of linguistic change, vol. 1 : Internal factors (Blackwell, Oxford 1994).
Liberman, A.M.; Mattingly, I.G.: The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21: 1-36 (1985).
Meltzoff, A.N.; Moore, M.K.: Explaining facial imitation: a theoretical model. Early Dev. Parenting 6: 179-192 (1997).
Meltzoff, A.N.; Moore, M.K.: Persons and representation: why infant imitation is important for theories of human development; in Nadel, Butterworth, Imitation in infancy, pp. 9-35 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1999).
Nye, P.W.; Fowler C.A.: Shadowing latency and imitation: the effect of familiarity with the phonetic patterning of English. J. Phonet. 31: 63-79 (2003).
Pierrehumbert, J.: Probabilistic phonology: discrimination and robustness; in. Bod, Hay, Jannedy, Probabilistic linguistics, pp. 177-228 (MIT Press, Cambridge 2003).
Pohl, J.: Quelques caractéristiques du français parlé en. Belgique. Langue fr. 60: 30-41 (1983).
Porter, R.J.; Lubker, J.F.: Rapid reproduction of vowel-vowel sequences: evidence for a fast and direct acousticmotoric linkage in speech. J. Speech. Hear. Res. 23: 593-602 (1980).
Rabiner, L.R.; Shafer R.W.: Digital Processing of Speech Signals (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs 1978).
Sakoe, H.; Chiba, S.: Dynamic programming algorithm, optimization for spoken word recognition. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Processing 26: 43-49 (1978).
Sancier, M.L.; Fowler, C.A.: Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. J. Phonet. 25: 421-436 (1997).
Sievers, E: Grundzüge der Phonetik zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermanischen Sprachen (Breitkopf & Härtel, Leipzig 1901). Cited by: Lehmann, W.P.: A reader in nineteenth century historical Indo-European linguistics (Indiana University Press, Bloomington 1967).
Tomasello, M. : Two hypotheses about primate cognition; in Heyes, Huber, The evolution, of cognition, pp. 165-183 (MIT Press, Cambridge 2000).
Trudgill, P.: Dialects in contact (Blackwell, Oxford. 1986).
Trudgill, P.: Accomodation between dialects; in Linn, Handbook of dialects and language variation, pp. 307-341 (Academic Press, New York 1988).
Vallabha, G.K.; Tuller, B.: Perceptuomotor bias in the imitation of steady-state vowels. J. acoust. Soc. Am. 116: 1184-1197 (2004a).
Vallabha, G.K.; Tuller, B.: Patterns of acoustic errors in the imitation of speech, Speech Pathol. May 5 (2004b).
Vihman, M.M.; DePaolis, R.A.: The role of mimesis in. infant language development: evidence for phytogeny; in. Knight, Hurford, Studdert Kennedy, The evolutionary emergence of language, pp. 130-145 (CUP, Cambridge 2000).
Warnant, L.: Phonétique et phonologie; en Blampain, Goosse, Klinkenberg, Wilmet, Le français en. Belgique: une langue, une communauté, pp. 163-174 (Louvain-la-Neuve, Duculot 1997).
Whiten, A.: Imitation of the sequential structure of actions by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J. comp. Psychol. 112: 270-281 (1998).
