Article (Scientific journals)
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patient Changes during the COVID-19 Quarantine.
Rodriguez, Alexandra; Steffens, Younes; Calvo-Henriquez, Christian et al.
2023In Medicina, 59 (8), p. 1475
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
37.pdf
Author postprint (1.27 MB)
Download
Annexes
demand_for_article_withdrawal_maedica.pdf
(66.07 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi UMONS are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; diet; gastroesophageal; head neck; laryngology; laryngopharyngeal; larynx; lockdown; otolaryngology; quarantine; reflux; stress; Humans; Quarantine; Communicable Disease Control; Beverages; Laryngopharyngeal Reflux; Medicine (all); General Medicine
Abstract :
[en] Background and Objective: To examine the effects of the lockdown on diet adherence and stress levels in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). Materials and Methods: Patients with a positive LPR diagnosis at the hypopharyngeal-esophageal impedance-pH monitoring were treated from a pre- to lockdown period with a 3-month high-protein, low-fat, alkaline, plant-based diet, with behavioral changes, and an association of pantoprazole (20 MG/d) and alginate (Gaviscon 3/d). The following patient-reported outcomes questionnaire and findings instrument were used: Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) and Reflux Sign Assessment (RSA). At the posttreatment time, patients were invited to evaluate the impact of lockdown on diet adherence and stress management with a predefined grid of foods and beverages and the perceived stress scale (PSS), respectively. Results: Thirty-two patients completed the evaluations. RSS-12 and RSA significantly improved from baseline to 3-month posttreatment. Most patients experienced mild-to-severe stress levels at the end of the lockdown. The level of stress substantially increased in 11 patients (34%) due to the lockdown, while it did not change in 11 patients (44%). In 11 cases (34%), patients reported that the adherence to the anti-reflux diet was better than initially presumed thanks to the lockdown period, while 44% (N = 14) reported that the lockdown did not impact the adherence to a diet. PSS and RSS-12 were significantly correlated at the end of the pandemic (rs = 0.681; p < 0.001). The increase in stress level was positively associated with the lack of adherence to diet (rs = 0.367; p = 0.039). Conclusions: During the lockdown, the diet habits of LPR patients were improved in one-third and unchanged in 44% of cases. The stress level was increased in one-third of patients, which was associated with an increase in symptom scores.
Disciplines :
Otolaryngology
Author, co-author :
Rodriguez, Alexandra;  Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
Steffens, Younes;  Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
Calvo-Henriquez, Christian;  Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Mayo-Yáñez, Miguel ;  Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Department, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC), 15006 A Coruña, Spain
Horoi, Mihaela;  Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, CHU Saint-Pierre, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
Lechien, Jérome  ;  Université de Mons - UMONS > Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Educatio > Service de Métrologie et Sciences du langage
Language :
English
Title :
Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patient Changes during the COVID-19 Quarantine.
Publication date :
17 August 2023
Journal title :
Medicina
ISSN :
1010-660X
eISSN :
1648-9144
Publisher :
Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI), Switzerland
Volume :
59
Issue :
8
Pages :
1475
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Research unit :
M112 - Anatomie humaine et Oncologie expérimentale
Research institute :
R550 - Institut des Sciences et Technologies de la Santé
R350 - Institut de recherche en sciences et technologies du langage
Commentary :
The present results were originally submitted to Mædica (ISSN 2069-6116) under peer-review. The present authors notified the journal they would not pursue the publication in Mædica in order to improve the content and submit the results to another journal. The journal dropped the revisions and published the manuscript as is without approval from the authors. The present authors did not agree on any of this and asked for the immediate retractation of the article (see annexe): https://doi.org/10.26574/maedica.2023.18.3.537
Available on ORBi UMONS :
since 25 December 2023

Statistics


Number of views
22 (9 by UMONS)
Number of downloads
16 (5 by UMONS)

Scopus citations®
 
0
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenAlex citations
 
0

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi UMONS