Paper published in a journal (Scientific congresses and symposiums)
Automatic Phone Alignment: A Comparison between Speaker-Independent Models and Models Trained on the Corpus to Align
Brognaux, Sandrine; Roekhaut, Sophie; Drugman, Thomas et al.
2012
 

Files


Full Text
5f9481_0f9f2ab55bbd7d74f6b6449178feb13a.pdf
Publisher postprint (315.15 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi UMONS are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] Several automatic phonetic alignment tools have been proposed in the literature. They generally use speaker-independent acoustic models of the language to align new corpora. The problem is that the range of provided models is limited. It does not cover all languages and speaking styles (spontaneous, expressive, etc.). This study investigates the possibility of directly training the statistical model on the corpus to align. The main advantage is that it is applicable to any language and speaking style. Moreover, comparisons indicate that it provides as good or better results than using speaker-independent models of the language. It shows that about 2% are gained, with a 20 ms threshold, by using our method. Experiments were carried out on neutral and expressive corpora in French and English. The study also points out that even a small neutral corpus of a few minutes can be exploited to train a model that will provide high-quality alignment.
Disciplines :
Languages & linguistics
Author, co-author :
Brognaux, Sandrine 
Roekhaut, Sophie
Drugman, Thomas
Beaufort, R.
Language :
English
Title :
Automatic Phone Alignment: A Comparison between Speaker-Independent Models and Models Trained on the Corpus to Align
Publication date :
19 October 2012
Event name :
International Conference on Natural Language Processing
Event place :
Kanazawa, Japan
Event date :
2012
Research unit :
F105 - Information, Signal et Intelligence artificielle
Research institute :
R450 - Institut NUMEDIART pour les Technologies des Arts Numériques
Available on ORBi UMONS :
since 19 October 2018

Statistics


Number of views
10 (0 by UMONS)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by UMONS)

Scopus citations®
 
10
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
8

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi UMONS