[en] Network analysis is an emerging field for the study of psychopathology that considers constructs as arising from the interactions among their constituents. Pairwise effects among psychological components are often investigated by using this framework. Few studies have applied Bayesian networks, models that include directed interactions to perform causal inference on psychological constructs. Directed graphical models may be less straightforward to interpret in case the construct at hand does not contain symptoms but instead psychometric items from self-report measures. However, they may be useful in validating specific research questions that arise while using standard pairwise network models. In this study, we use Bayesian networks to investigate a well-known psychological construct, empathy from the Interpersonal Reactivity Index, in large two samples of 1973 university students from Belgium. Overall, our results support the hypotheses emphasizing empathic concern (i.e., sympathy) as causally important in the construct of empathy, and overall attribute the primacy of emotional components of empathy over their intellectual counterparts. Bayesian networks help researchers identify the plausible causal relationships in psychometric data, to gain new insight on the psychological construct under examination, help generate new hypotheses and provide evidence relevant to old ones.
Disciplines :
Psychiatry
Author, co-author :
Briganti, Giovanni ; Université de Mons - UMONS > Faculté de Médecine et de Pharmacie > Service de Neurosciences
Decety, Jean; University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
Scutari, Marco; Istituto Dalle Molle di Studi sull’Intelligenza Artificiale, Manno, Switzerland
McNally, Richard J.; Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Linkowski, Paul; Université libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles, Belgium
Language :
English
Title :
Using Bayesian Networks to Investigate Psychological Constructs: The Case of Empathy
Bernstein E. E. Heeren A. McNally R. J. (2017). Unpacking rumination and executive control: A network perspective. Clinical Psychological Science, 5(5), 816–826. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617702717
Bird J. C. Evans R. Waite F. Loe B. S. Freeman D. (2019). Adolescent paranoia: Prevalence, structure, and causal mechanisms. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 45(5), 1134–1142. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sby180
Borsboom D. (2017). A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry, 16(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20375
Borsboom D. Cramer A. O. J. (2013). Network analysis: An integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9(1), 91–121. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185608
Borsboom D. Deserno M. K. Rhemtulla M. Epskamp S. Fried E. I. McNally R. J. Robinaugh D. J. Perugini M. Dalege J. Costantini G. Isvoranu A.-M. Wysocki A. C. van Borkulo C. D. van Bork R. Waldorp L. J. (2021). Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 1(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00055-w
Briganti G. Fried E. I. Linkowski P. (2019). Network analysis of contingencies of self-worth scale in 680 university students. Psychiatry Research, 272, 252–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.080
Briganti G. Kempenaers C. Braun S. Fried E. I. Linkowski P. (2018a). Network analysis of empathy items from the interpersonal reactivity index in 1973 young adults. Psychiatry Research, 265, 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.03.082
Briganti G. Linkowski P. (2020). Network approach to items and domains from the toronto alexithymia scale. Psychological Reports, 123(5), 2038–2052. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294119889586
Briganti G. Linkowski P. Fried E. Kempenaers C. Braun S. (2018b). Data for: “Network analysis of empathy items from the interpersonal reactivity index in 1973 young adults” V3. https://doi.org/10.17632/8vhkd7mw63.3
Briganti G. Scutari M. Linkowski P. (2020). A machine learning approach to relationships among alexithymia components. Psychiatria Danubina, 32(1), 180–187.
Briganti G. Scutari M. Linkowski P. (2021a). Network structures of symptoms from the Zung depression scale. Psychological Reports, 124(4), 1897–1911. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120942116
Briganti G. Scutari M. McNally R. J. (2021b). A tutorial on Bayesian Networks for psychopathology researchers. Psychological Methods. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000479
Cernis E. Evans R. Ehlers A. Freeman D. (2021). Dissociation in relation to other mental health conditions: An exploration using network analysis. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 136(6), 460–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.08.023
Cliffordson C. (2002). The hierarchical structure of empathy: Dimensional organization and relations to social functioning. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 43(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00268
Corrigan P. W. Giffort D. Rashid F. Leary M. Okeke I. (1999). Recovery as a psychological construct. Community Mental Health Journal, 35(3), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018741302682
Costantini G. Richetin J. Borsboom D. Fried E. I. Rhemtulla M. Perugini M. (2015). Development of indirect measures of conscientiousness: Combining a facets approach and network analysis. European Journal of Personality, 29(5), 548–567. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2014
Cronbach L. J. Meehl P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
Dalege J. Borsboom D. van Harreveld F. van der Maas H. L. J. (2017). Network analysis on attitudes. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(5), 528–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617709827
Davis M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.
Decety J. (2020). Empathy in medicine: What it is, and how much we really need it. The American Journal of Medicine, 133(5), 561–566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.12.012
Decety J. Bartal I. B.-A. Uzefovsky F. Knafo-Noam A. (2016). Empathy as a driver of prosocial behaviour: Highly conserved neurobehavioural mechanisms across species. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 371(1686), 20150077. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0077
Decety J. Cacioppo J. (2010). Frontiers in human neuroscience: The golden triangle and beyond. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 767–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610388780
Decety J. Ickes W. (2011). The social neuroscience of empathy. MIT Press.
Decety J. Lamm C. (2009). The biological basis of empathy. In Handbook of neuroscience for the behavioral Sciences (pp. 940–957). John Wiley & Sons.
Decety J. Lamm C. (2011). 15 empathy versus personal distress: Recent evidence from social neuroscience. In The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 199–213). Boston Review.
Decety J. Smith K. E. Norman G. J. (2018). Predictive utility cannot substitute for construct validity. Medical Education, 52(4), 457–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13506
Eisenberg N. Eggum N. D. (2009). Empathic responding: Sympathy and personal distress. In The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 71–830). The MIT Press.
Epskamp S. Borsboom D. Fried E. I. (2018). Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1
Epskamp S. Cramer A. O. J. Waldorp L. J. Schmittmann V. D. Borsboom D. (2012). qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i04
Epskamp S. Fried E. I. (2018). A tutorial on regularized partial correlation networks. Psychological Methods, 23(4), 617–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000167
Fried E. I. (2017). What are psychological constructs? On the nature and statistical modelling of emotions, intelligence, personality traits and mental disorders. Health Psychology Review, 11(2), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1306718
Fried E. I. (2020). Lack of theory building and testing impedes progress in the factor and network literature. Psychological Inquiry, 31(4), 271–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1853461
Fried E. I. Cramer A. O. J. (2017). Moving forward: Challenges and directions for psychopathological network theory and methodology. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 12(6), 999–1020. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617705892
Gleichgerrcht E. Decety J. (2011). The costs of empathy among health professionals. In Empathy: From bench to bedside (pp. 245). MIT Press.
Gleichgerrcht E. Decety J. (2013). Empathy in clinical practice: How individual dispositions, gender, and experience moderate empathic concern, burnout, and emotional distress in physicians. Plos One, 8(4), Article e61526. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0061526
Hoffman M. L. (1991). Is empathy altruistic? Psychological Inquiry, 2(2), 131–133. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0202_6
Jones P. J. Mair P. Riemann B. C. Mugno B. L. McNally R. J. (2018). A network perspective on comorbid depression in adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 53, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.09.008
Kendler K. S. Zachar P. Craver C. (2011). What kinds of things are psychiatric disorders? Psychological Medicine, 41(6), 1143–1150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291710001844
Kossakowski J. J. Epskamp S. Kieffer J. M. Borkulo C. D. van Rhemtulla M. Borsboom D. (2016). The application of a network approach to Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL): Introducing a new method for assessing HRQoL in healthy adults and cancer patients. Quality of Life Research, 25(4), 781–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1127-z
Maathuis M. Drton M. Lauritzen S. Wainwright M. (2018). Handbook of graphical models. CRC Press.
Marsman M. Borsboom D. Kruis J. Epskamp S. Bork R. van Waldorp L. J. Maas H. L. J. van der Maris G. (2018). An introduction to network psychometrics: Relating ising network models to item response theory models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2017.1379379
McFarland S. Brown D. Webb M. (2013). Identification with all humanity as a moral concept and psychological construct. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 194–198. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412471346
McNally R. J. (2016). Can network analysis transform psychopathology? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 86, 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2016.06.006
McNally R. J. Heeren A. Robinaugh D. J. (2017a). A Bayesian network analysis of posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms in adults reporting childhood sexual abuse. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 8(suppl 3), 1341276. https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2017.1341276
McNally R. J. Mair P. Mugno B. L. Riemann B. C. (2017b). Co-Morbid obsessive–compulsive disorder and depression: A Bayesian network approach. Psychological Medicine, 47(7), 1204–1214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291716003287
McNally R. J. Robinaugh D. J. Deckersbach T. Sylvia L. G. Nierenberg A. A. (2021). Estimating the symptom structure of bipolar disorder via network analysis: Energy dysregulation as a central symptom. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 131(1), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000715
Melton G. B. (1983). Ruralness as a psychological construct. In Rural psychology (pp. 1–13). Springer.
Moffa G. Catone G. Kuipers J. Kuipers E. Freeman D. Marwaha S. Lennox B. R. Broome M. R. Bebbington P. (2017). Using directed acyclic graphs in epidemiological research in psychosis: An analysis of the role of bullying in psychosis. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 43(6), 1273–1279. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbx013
Pearl J. (2009). Causality (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Pearl J. Mackenzie D. (2018). The book of why: The new science of cause and effect. Basic Books.
R Core Team. (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
Røysamb E. Nes R. B. Czajkowski N. O. Vassend O. (2018). Genetics, personality and wellbeing. A twin study of traits, facets and life satisfaction. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 12298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-29881-x
Ruff R. M. Light R. H. Parker S. B. Levin H. S. (1997). The psychological construct of word fluency. Brain and Language, 57(3), 394–405. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1755
Russell S. Norvig P. (2002). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach. Prentice Hall.
Scutari M. (2010). Learning bayesian networks with the bnlearn R package. Journal of Statistical Software, 35(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v035.i03
Scutari M. Denis J.-B. (2021). Bayesian networks: With examples in R (2nd ed.). CRC Press.
Scutari M. Graafland C. E. Gutiérrez J. M. (2018). Who learns better bayesian network structures: Constraint-based, score-based or hybrid algorithms? In International Conference on Probabilistic Graphical Models (pp. 416–427), Prague, Czech Republic, September 11–14, 2018.
Thomas J. (2013). Association of personal distress with burnout, compassion fatigue, and compassion satisfaction among clinical social workers. Journal of Social Service Research, 39(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2013.771596
Thrash T. M. Elliot A. J. (2003). Inspiration as a psychological construct. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 871. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.871
van Borkulo C. D. Borsboom D. Epskamp S. Blanken T. F. Boschloo L. Schoevers R. A. Waldorp L. J. (2014). A new method for constructing networks from binary data. Scientific Reports, 4, 5918. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05918
van der Maas H. L. J. Dolan C. V. Grasman R. P. P. P. Wicherts J. M. Huizenga H. M. Raijmakers M. E. J. (2006). A dynamical model of general intelligence: The positive manifold of intelligence by mutualism. Psychological Review, 113(4), 842–861. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.842
