[fr] Pour une personne sourde, traiter les sons de parole au travers d’un implant cochléaire (IC) peut affecter la perception du trait de nasalité vocalique. Des études menées auprès d’enfants porteurs d’IC ont toutefois montré que ceux-ci pouvaient produire et percevoir efficacement les voyelles nasales du français via l’exploitation privilégiée d’indices acoustiques comme les indices temporels et visuels, et que l’efficacité perceptive variait avec l’âge d’implantation et le niveau d’exposition à la Langue française Parlée Complétée (LfPC). [en] For a deaf person, processing speech sounds through a cochlear implant (CI) can affect the perception of the vowel nasal feature. However, studies carried out on children with CIs have shown that they can produce and perceive French nasal vowels efficiently by exploiting acoustic cues such as temporal and visual cues, and that perceptual effectiveness varies with the age of implantation and the level of exposure to French Cued Speech.
Disciplines :
Treatment & clinical psychology
Author, co-author :
Fagniart, Sophie ; Université de Mons - UMONS > Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education > Service de Métrologie et Sciences du langage
Delvaux, Véronique ; Université de Mons - UMONS > Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education > Service de Métrologie et Sciences du langage
Harmegnies, Bernard ; Université de Mons - UMONS > Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education > Service du Doyen de la Faulté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education
Huberlant Anne; Centre Comprendre et Parler
Huet, Kathy ; Université de Mons - UMONS > Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education > Service de Métrologie et Sciences du langage
Piccaluga, Myriam ; Université de Mons - UMONS > Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Education > Service de Métrologie et Sciences du langage
Charlier Brigitte; ULB - Université Libre de Bruxelles ; Centre Comprendre et Parler
Language :
French
Title :
Perception et production de la nasalité vocalique : variabilité et stratégies de compensation chez des enfants porteurs d’implants cochléaires.
Publication date :
December 2024
Journal title :
ANAE: Approche Neuropsychologique des Apprentissages chez l'Enfant
ISSN :
0999-792X
Publisher :
PDG Communication, France
Special issue title :
N°193 - Le développement des compétences en français oral et écrit chez l'enfant sourd
Volume :
36/6
Issue :
Décembre 2024
Pages :
608-616
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Research unit :
P362 - Métrologie et Sciences du langage
Research institute :
R350 - Institut de recherche en sciences et technologies du langage
Bajkent, D., Gaudrain, E., Tamati, T. N., & Wagner, A. (2016). Perception and Psychoacoustics of Speech in Cochlear Implant Users. In A. T. Cacace, E. de Kleine, A. G. Holt, P. van Dijk (Eds.), Scientific Foundations of Audiology Perspectives from Physics, Biology, Modeling, and Medicine (pp. 285-319). Plural Publishing.
Baskent, D., & Shannon, R. V. (2005). Interactions between cochlear implant electrode insertion depth and frequency-place mapping. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 777(3), 1405-1416. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1856273
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2023). Praat: Doing Phonetics by Computer. https://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
Borel, S. (2015). Perception auditive, visuelle et audiovisuelle des voyelles nasales par les adultes devenus sourds. Lecture labiale, implant cochléaire, implant du tronc cérébral. Université Sorbonne Paris Cité.
Borel, S., Semiclaes, W., Sterkers, 0., & Vaissière, J. (2019). L'identification des consonnes et voyelles nasales par les adultes implantés cochléaires francophones. Audiology Direcf, 3, 1. https://doi.org/10.1051/audiodir/201903001
Bouton, S., Semiclaes, W., Bertoncini, J., & Colé, P. (2012). Perception of Speech Features by French-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(1), 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1044/10924388(2011/10-0330)
Carignan, C. (2014). An acoustic and articulatory examination of the "oral" in "nasal": The oral articulations of French nasal vowels are not arbitrary. Journal of Phonetics, 46,23-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2014.05.001
Carignan, C. (2018). Using ultrasound and nasalance to separate oral and nasal contributions to formant frequencies of nasalized vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 743(5), 2588-2601. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5034760
Carignan, C, Chen, J., Harvey, M., Stockigt, C., Simpson, J., & Strangways, S. (2023).An investigation of the dynamics of vowel nasalization in Arabana using machine learning of acoustic features. Laboratory Phonology, 74(1). https://doi.org/10.16995/labphon.9152
Delattre, P., & Monnot, M. (1968). The role of duration in the identification of french nasal vowels. IRAL. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 6(1-4). https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1968.6.1-4.267
Delvaux, V. (2012). Les voyelles nasales du français. Aérodynamique, articulation, acoustique et perception. Peter Lang. https://www.peterlang.com/document/1108931
DiNino, M., Arenberg, J. G., Duchen, A. L R., & Winn, M. B.(2020). Effects of Age and Cochlear Implantation on Spectrally Cued Speech Categorization. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(7), 2425-2440. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020JSLHR-19-00127
Duchesne, L, Sutton, A, & Bergeron, F. (2009). Language Achievement in Children Who Received Cochlear Implants Between 1 and 2 Years of Age: Group Trends and Individual Patterns. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 74(4), 465485. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enp010
Fagniart, S., Delvaux, V., Harmegnies, B., Huberlant, A., Huet, K., Piccaluga, M., & Charlier, B. (2024b). Producing nasal vowels without nasalization? Perceptuai judgments and acoustic measurements of nasal/oral vowels produced by children with cochlear implants and typically hearing peers Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024JSLHR-24-00083
Fagniart, S., Delvaux, V., Harmegnies, B., Huberlant, A., Huet, K., Piccaluga, M., Watterman, L, & Charlier, B. (2024a). Nasal/Oral Vowel Perception in French-Speaking Children With Cochlear Implants and Children With Typical Hearing. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 67(4), 1243-1267. https://doi.org/10.1044/2024JSLHR-23-00274
Fagyal, Z, Kibbee, D., & Jenkins, F. (2006). French: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Fougeron, C, & Smith, C. L(1993). French. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 23(2), 73-76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025100300004874
Guevara, N., & Macherey, 0. (2018).Traitement du signal. In Surdités: Actualités, innovations et espoirs. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Hawks, J. W, Fourakis, M. S., Skinner, M. W., Holden, T. A, & Holden, L K. (1997). Effects of formant bandwidth on the identification of synthetic vowels by cochlear implant recipients. Far and Hearing, 78(6), 479-487.
Karltorp, E., Eklof, M., Ostlund, E., Asp, F, Tideholm, B., & Lofkvist, U. (2020). Cochlear implants before 9 months of age led to more natural spoken language developmentwithout increased surgical risks.Acta Paediatrica, 709(2), 332-341. https://d0i.0rg/10.1111/apa.14954
Leybaert, J., & LaSasso, C. J. (2010). Cued Speech for Enhancing Speech Perception and First Language Development of Children With Cochlear Implants. Trends in Amplification, 74(2), 96-112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1084713810375567
Machart, L (2022). Production de parole chez l'enfant sourd: Bénéfices de l'exposition à la Langue française Parlée Complétée associée à l'implantation cochléaire [These de doctorat, Université Grenoble Alpes]. https://www.theses.fr/2022GRALS030
MacMillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991). Detection theory: A user"s guide. Cambridge University Press.
Maeda, S. (1993). Acoustics of vowel nasalization and articulatory shifts in french nasal vowels. In Nasals, Nasalization, and the Velum (pp. 147-167). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-360380-7.50010-7
Montagu, J. (2007). Analyse acoustique et perceptive des voyelles nasales et nasalisées du Français parisien [These de doctorat, Paris 3]. https://www.theses.fr/2007PA030148
Moon, I. J., & Hong, S. H. (2014). What Is Temporal Fine Structure and Why Is It Important? Korean Journal of Audiology, 78(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.7874/kja.2014.18.1.1
Pisoni, D. B., Cleary, M., Geers, A. E., & Tobey, E. A. (1999). Individual Differences in Effectiveness of Cochlear Implants in Children Who Are Prelingually Deaf: New Process Measures of Performance. Volta Review, 707(3), 111-164.
Rosen, S. (1992). Temporal information in speech: Acoustic, auditory and linguistic aspects. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 336(1278), 367-373.
Styler, W. (2017). On the acoustical features of vowel nasality in English and French. The Journal ofthe Acoustical Society of America, 742(4), 2469-2482. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5008854
Tamati, T. N., Pisoni, D. B., & Moberly, A. C. (2022). Speech and Language Outcomes in Adults and Children with Cochlear Implants. Annual Review of Linguistics, 8(1), 299-319. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031220-011554
Van Bogaert, L, Machart, L, Gerber, S., Lœvenbruck, H., Vilain, A., & Consortium EULAUES (2023). Speech rehabilitation in children with cochlear implants using a multisensory (French Cued Speech) or a hearing-focused (Auditory Verbal Therapy) approach. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 17,1152516. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2023.1152516
